I guess a theme that is emerging from this blog and from my life in general is around the whole idea of how hard it is to actually go green, how many ideas need to be trialled and discarded before you come up with a way, a simple clearcut unequivocal way, to make a meaningful dent in your carbon emissions.
It can be discouraging. Often, it’s a process of two steps forward, one step back, as are most things in life. It requires a lot of math to go green meaningfully. But it has many side benefits, and for me anyway, is a worthwhile side project.
I am always on the lookout for scalable strategies – stuff that might work, but that people might not have tried in detail before. And I like to produce honest case studies based on my experience. Sometimes the failure is more interesting than the success.
As I go through each one of these processes, constantly scanning for new content, I learn not only about the benefits of a thing but also the limitations and drawbacks. I learn that the process of going green is very much circumstance dependent.
It’s all part of a bigger long term vision. The other morning while I was writing in my diary at a cafe, I had a vision of all of Kapiti uniting as a single city, with the bright lights powered by renewable energy. The small things we do today I think create the future. The little tests, little experiments, build wisdom and resource for something far grander.
But the hard work and hard math has to be done first. Building the green city of Kapiti involves coming to an understanding about the limitations and nuances of renewable power. As much as anything.
